Uncategorized

DR Congo: UNICEF and Gavi launch call to manufacturers in support of accelerated access to Bundibugyo Ebolavirus vaccines

Countries: Democratic Republic of the Congo, Uganda Sources: GAVI Alliance, UN Children’s Fund NEW YORK/GENEVA/COPENHAGEN, 24 June 2026 – In a move designed to accelerate access to a vaccine against Bundibugyo Ebolavirus disease, UNICEF and Gavi, the Vaccine Alliance today announced the launch of a Request for Expression of Interest (EOI) to gather information from vaccine developers and manufacturers on their plans to develop a vaccine against the disease. Building on Gavi’s recent commitment of US$40 million to support accelerated vaccine access, this EOI will help inform how that financing can best support manufacturing scale-up and rapid access to doses if and when they become available. The Expression of Interest, issued by UNICEF today, builds on ongoing engagement with manufacturers and partners including WHO and the Coalition for Epidemic Preparedness Innovations (CEPI), and will support an expedited assessment and prioritisation of the most promising vaccine candidates. Any subsequent agreements support manufacturing readiness – including the production of investigational doses to manufacturing scale-up – for emergency usein outbreak response, in line with appropriate policy recommendations. The severe and highly lethal Bundibugyo Ebolavirus is the source of the current Ebola outbreak in the Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC) and Uganda. With 1,094 cases confirmed, and 277 deaths in eastern DRC, some of them children, and 20 confirmed cases and two deaths in Uganda, accelerating the development and roll-out of effective and safe vaccines is a critical global priority. While the Gavi-funded global stockpile of vaccines against the Ebola Zaire species – procured and managed by UNICEF on behalf of the International Coordinating Group on Vaccine Provision – has been leveraged several times for outbreak response, there is currently no vaccine available against the Bundibugyo species. Gavi has committed US$50 million through its First Response Fund (FRF) to support the ongoing outbreak response: up to US$10 million dedicated to safeguarding routine immunization, protection of health care workers, and outbreak response, and up to US$40 million as pull financing to accelerate vaccine access. The EOI will help Gavi design an intervention that leverages this vaccine financing for greatest impact: accelerating manufacturing scale-up of the most promising candidates, supporting regulatory pathways such as WHO Emergency Use Listing (EUL) and WHO prequalification, and establishing access to doses of investigational and licensed vaccines. This will ensure that once a vaccine proves effective and policy recommendations have been issued, doses are available and can be rapidly deployed whether for emergency use prior to WHO EUL or, in the longer term, as part of an established procurement mechanism supporting licensed vaccines. In the call to developers and manufacturers to provide information about their candidate vaccines – including projected development timelines, product suitability, and alignment with public health priorities – special consideration will be given to proposals where production will be based in Africa. Manufacturer responses will also inform future UNICEF procurement of vaccines. ##### Notes to editors: The Expression of Interest is published on the United Nations Global Marketplace ungm.org. The Expression of Interest comes on the back of WHO recommendations on prioritization of Bundibugyo ebolavirus vaccine candidates for evaluation in clinical trials and Coalition for Epidemic Preparedness Innovations (CEPI)’s funding to fast track development of vaccine candidates. While CEPI supports early-stage research and clinical development of candidate vaccines, the Gavi–UNICEF EOI is designed to assess manufacturing readiness, scale-up needs and financing approaches to ensure doses can be produced at scale and deployed quickly if candidates prove successful.

DR Congo: UNICEF and Gavi launch call to manufacturers in support of accelerated access to Bundibugyo Ebolavirus vaccines Read More »

30b19cd1 9e73 48f4 B376 17867557cd1b 0a97RS

Côte d’Ivoire: WFP Côte d’Ivoire Country Brief, May 2026

Countries: Côte d’Ivoire, Burkina Faso, Ghana, Mali Source: World Food Programme Please refer to the attached file. SITUATION OVERVIEW • According to the October 2025 Cadre Harmonisé projections, over 1.3 million people will face acute food insecurity (Phases 3-4) between June and August 2026, with an additional 3.9 million in Phase 2 —representing a 43 percent increase compared to 2025. In Tchologo and Bounkani regions, over 150,000 people (13 percent of total population) are acutely food insecure, a 36 percent increase from 2025. • As of April 2026, the country hosts 82,789 forcibly displaced people, primarily from Burkina Faso, Mali and Ghana. This includes 74,623 refugees, 2,608 asylum seekers and 5,558 people not yet registered. Women and children represent 79 percent of this population. Around 82 percent of refugees live in host communities and 18 percent reside in two transit sites.

Côte d’Ivoire: WFP Côte d’Ivoire Country Brief, May 2026 Read More »

31ddc7f2 8e98 502f 9d79 Ea5a801d8e09 SZt2S8

UNHCR Ethiopia | WASH factsheet | January-March 2026

Countries: Ethiopia, South Sudan Source: UN High Commissioner for Refugees Please refer to the attached file. ◦ Define the WASH pathways for transition in accordance with the 50 by 35 and Makatet Road Map ◦ Ensure that WASH services in woredas and areas hosting forcibly displaced and stateless population are improved and included in facilities managed by regional water bureau and local water development Offices. ◦ Continue to strengthen fundraising efforts to complement targeted humanitarian assistance, while actively advocating for resource mobilization in collaboration with operating partners and other key stakeholders. ◦ Establish reliable, sustainable and energy efficient water supply systems in refugee hosting areas. ◦ Define area based planning with critical milestones and pillars for water system transition to be operationalized.

UNHCR Ethiopia | WASH factsheet | January-March 2026 Read More »

3a9e85f0 29f1 5d93 B28a 2a4d1ee591cf UCWe92

UNHCR Ethiopia | Public Health factsheet | January-March 2026

Country: Ethiopia Source: UN High Commissioner for Refugees Please refer to the attached file. ▪ UNHCR, in collaboration with various partners, provides primary healthcare services to refugees and the neighboring host communities in Ethiopia, while also facilitating referrals to secondary and tertiary hospitals for refugees and asylum seekers. To promote effective access to healthcare and support integration into national health systems, UNHCR backs 26 health centers, 2 health posts, and 2 mobile health posts (at emergency refugee site) within refugee camps and settlements. This initiative ensures the delivery of essential primary healthcare services to both refugees and local host populations. ▪ UNHCR’s public health operations, working together with partners, cover several regions: Afar, South Omo, Amhara, Benishangul-Gumuz, Somali, and Gambella. These efforts include deploying healthcare staff to the field, keeping a steady supply of important medicines and medical materials, and providing healthcare services to refugees living in Addis Ababa. ▪ UNHCR, in collaboration with DPO, GOAL, and CUAMM, is supporting the emergency refugee response at Tomorok and Muon points of entry, as well as the new refugee site at Luakdong. Since January 2026, mobile clinic services have provided 12,628 outpatient consultations, with malaria accounting for 24% of reported morbidity cases. In addition, 74 emergency medical cases were referred to secondary health facilities, and 94% of deliveries were attended by skilled health workers.

UNHCR Ethiopia | Public Health factsheet | January-March 2026 Read More »

82eccb83 C5b8 43cd Ac75 16bb4af55dfe GPT9Fe

Enhancing Mediation: Lessons from Mozambique

Country: Mozambique Source: Swiss Peace Foundation Please refer to the attached file. Mediation is widely understood as third-party-assisted negotiations aimed at preventing, managing, or resolving armed conflicts in which the conflict parties’ consent to the mediator taking some degree of control over the process.1 The value of mediation as a tool to facilitate political solutions to violent conflict is under severe pressure, a major review of mediation practice in 2024 noted that “the policy and practice of mediation have struggled to keep pace with the changing realities of conflict and global politics. Innovation is necessary to meet the challenges presented by contemporary armed conflicts; specifically, approaches to mediation are needed that respond to the armed actors that are integral to contemporary conflict environments. Dudouet et al. note that the global context in which war-to-peace transitions take place has changed profoundly. Traditional liberal peacebuilding models are under strain, and mediators are increasingly confronted with fragmented, transnational, or semi-authoritarian environments that challenge established assumptions about peacemaking. New patterns of conflict, such as the internationalization of internal wars, the fragmentation of armed groups, and the rise of actors with Islamist agendas, create additional complexities. Meanwhile, a new generation of mediators from outside the traditional Western sphere is reshaping the ways peace can be facilitated, prompting both challenges and opportunities for international engagement in peace processes. In response to the evolving landscape of contemporary armed conflicts, mediation practice has evolved to include a broader range of actors and innovative approaches that emphasize local engagement, leverage technology to achieve inclusivity, and address the socioeconomic factors driving armed conflicts. The field of mediation has also undergone significant professionalization. The recognition of the complexity of contemporary armed conflicts and the challenges mediators face has led to the establishment of dedicated mediation support structures providing technical expertise and hands-on operational support to mediation teams, and which promote learning from past initiatives. Notwithstanding these advances, it is increasingly common that the parties to an armed conflict, be they international, national, or more localized armed groups, are often reluctant to engage in serious peace talks. Mediation processes are too frequently not welcome, not working, or not equal to the disruptive local, national, and geopolitical forces of the current moment.5 In summary, Dudouet et al. ask, “What are the implications of the downward trend in signed peace agreements and the upward trend in new mediators?” Mediation, as the mainstay of international conflict resolution initiatives, requires continuous updating and evolution to meet the challenges of contemporary armed conflicts. The process of identifying replicable practices from successful mediation efforts aims to enhance mediation and ameliorate the impacts of armed conflicts. In this regard, the process leading to the signing in Mozambique of the Maputo Accord for Peace and National Reconciliation on August 6, 2019 holds a number of lessons for policymakers and mediation practitioners.

Enhancing Mediation: Lessons from Mozambique Read More »