Uncategorized

oPt: “Like an electric shock”: Khan Al-Ahmar communities face forced displacement as Israeli authorities open West Bank settlement tenders

Country: occupied Palestinian territory Source: Medical Aid for Palestinians On 1 June, Israeli authorities will invite bids from private companies to construct 3,400 new settlement units in the occupied West Bank – a step that would effectively cut off occupied East Jerusalem from the rest of the occupied West Bank, further fragment Palestinian territory, forcibly displace communities including Khan al-Ahmar and restrict access to essential healthcare. This step would consolidate Israeli control over the corridor linking East Jerusalem to the Ma’ale Adumim settlement bloc – an outcome widely recognised by governments as undermining the viability of a contiguous Palestinian state and violating international law. In a joint statement last week, the UK and partner governments warned that companies involved in such settlement activity may face “legal and reputational consequences.” Palestinian families in Khan Al-Ahmar now face imminent forced displacement after Israeli authorities moved last week to revive long-standing demolition orders against the community. Khan Al-Ahmar is one of 18 Bedouin and herding communities in the path of the plan. Around 4,000 Palestinians across the 18 communities could lose their homes and land. Abu Khamees, a community leader in Khan Al-Ahmar, has lived under the shadow of demolition orders for years. Nothing, he says, prepared him for this. “Families here are not prepared to leave. We had been living in limbo for years given a temporary halt on the demolition order. The decision for imminent forced displacement was like an electric shock to us. People are anxious about where to go with their children as well as how to access essential services like health and education. People here have already been suffering because reaching healthcare has been extremely difficult, with interrupted services due to movement restrictions and checkpoints. “This is a nail in the coffin of the so-called two-state solution; with the forced displacement of our community Khan Al-Ahmar, and the completion of the E1 settlement project, which has been considered a redline by Western governments for decades. This also jeopardises regional peace and stability. What is the international community willing to do after all these empty promises?” MAP’s mobile clinics have delivered essential healthcare to over 33,000 Palestinians across 22 communities since 2025. Many of these communities are in “Area C”, which covers approximately 60% of the West Bank and is under full Israeli military control, where access to permanent health services is denied due to Israel’s apartheid policies. In these areas, mobile care is often the only lifeline, reaching isolated communities that are cut off from hospitals and clinics due to movement restrictions and settlement expansion. Israel’s illegal settlement expansion across the West Bank has systematically fragmented Palestinian communities, severing patients from hospitals and clinics through settler-only roads, checkpoints and the separation wall. Settler violence has further deterred patients and healthcare workers from travelling. The result is a population denied timely, consistent access to the healthcare they urgently need. Khan al-Ahmar is not an isolated case. A parallel E2 project south of Bethlehem would see around 2,500 new settlement units built in a corridor designed to sever the southern West Bank in half. Israeli authorities have already approved 3,401 new settlement units in the E1 area alone. Israeli settlement expansion is compounded by escalating settler violence, which forms part of a broader coercive environment driving the displacement of Palestinians and entrenching de facto annexation. In a single week (12-18 May 2026), settlers carried out more than 50 attacks, including arson targeting homes, farmland and a mosque. According to the United Nations Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs (OCHA) , 870 attacks have been recorded across more than 220 communities so far this year – an average of six per day. Since January 2025, settler violence and related access restrictions have displaced thousands of Palestinians across the West Bank, with at least 38-45 rural and herding communities fully or largely emptied. Aseel Baidoun, MAP’s Deputy Director of Advocacy and Communications based in the West Bank, said: “The threatened destruction of Khan al-Ahmar exposes the hollowness of years of international handwringing over illegal settlements. Governments have spent decades calling E1 a red line, warning it would shatter any prospects of a viable Palestinian state, while doing virtually nothing to curb Israel’s impunity. “If Khan al-Ahmar is erased from the map, it will not happen quietly or accidentally. It will happen after years of empty statements, diplomatic theatre, and deliberate political cowardice from governments that claim to support international law while allowing Israel to carve apart the West Bank piece by piece. Empty condemnation while illegal settlements expand in plain sight is not diplomacy – it’s complicity in the ethnic cleansing.” MAP calls on the UK government to follow in the Netherlands, Spain, Slovenia, and Ireland’s footsteps and end trade with illegal Israeli settlements in the West Bank. This move, backed by 119 MPs, is consistent with the International Court of Justice’s July 2024 ruling that Israel’s decades-long occupation of the West Bank is unlawful. Nearly two years on from the ICJ’s advisory opinion, the UK government has still not published its legal review or set out any concrete steps to implement it. [ENDS] Aseel Baidoun, Deputy Director of Advocacy and Communications, based in Ramallah is available for interview on request. Please contact the press office to arrange at: press@map.org.uk or +44 (0) 203 869 1310 About Medical Aid for Palestinians (MAP) Medical Aid for Palestinians (MAP) works for a future where every Palestinian has access to a comprehensive, effective and locally-led system of healthcare, and the full realisation of their rights to health and dignity. We work in the occupied Palestinian territory and in Palestinian refugee camps in Lebanon.

oPt: “Like an electric shock”: Khan Al-Ahmar communities face forced displacement as Israeli authorities open West Bank settlement tenders Read More »

2012d442 6a88 57fc 9abc A3dbe5c19db8 B4Fwwh

World: Humanitarian Diplomacy Re-Imagined | Towards a community-driven and justice-oriented approach to protect civilians

Country: World Source: Oxfam Please refer to the attached file. Humanitarian diplomacy is gaining renewed prominence within the European Union (EU) and among its Member States, with new policy initiatives and strategies aimed at strengthening the protection of civilians and promoting compliance with International Humanitarian Law (IHL). However, this momentum risks remaining largely rhetorical unless it is fundamentally reoriented toward tangible protection outcomes, meaningful engagement with conflict-affected communities, and accountability for violations. Today’s conflicts – characterised by rising geopolitical tensions, weakened multilateralism, and persistent impunity – underscore the urgent need to rethink humanitarian diplomacy. Across contexts such as Sudan, Gaza, the Democratic Republic of Congo, Lebanon, and Ukraine, civilians continue to face grave violations of IHL with limited consequences for perpetrators. This has eroded trust in international tools and mechanisms, while at the EU level it has raised serious questions about the credibility and consistency of its action and that of its Member States. This briefing argues that humanitarian diplomacy must be re-imagined as community-driven and justice-oriented. Rather than focusing primarily on access negotiations or diplomatic processes, it should prioritise the rights, safety and dignity of people affected by conflict and guarantee their protection. This requires a shift from top-down, state-centric approaches to models that recognise and empower local actors as central agents of diplomacy. Community leaders, civil society organisations, and local networks already play a critical role in negotiating access, mediating tensions, and protecting civilians – often with greater legitimacy and effectiveness than international actors. matic efforts are informed by realities on the ground. The report concludes with key recommendations to the EU and EU Member States.

World: Humanitarian Diplomacy Re-Imagined | Towards a community-driven and justice-oriented approach to protect civilians Read More »

E7677b61 7fbd 4322 9367 B64dd134c750 9uKwhu

South Sudan: DRC Situational Report #5 Jonglei Emergency (28 May 2026)

Country: South Sudan Source: Danish Refugee Council Please refer to the attached file. Situation update The situation across Jonglei remains fragile and volatile, characterised by localized violence, active conflict near populated areas, and growing humanitarian needs. Akobo County is calm, enabling an active humanitarian scale-up with 30 partners now on the ground and 36,000 IDPs returned. Chuil saw two incidents during the reporting period – a revenge killing on 13 May and an armed attack on a village near the Upper Nile border on 23 May resulting in four deaths and two injuries, though the overall situation remains manageable. Yuai presents the most acute security concern: opposition forces captured the village of Moto on 24 May, triggering youth mobilization, and on 26 May active fighting between SSPDF and SPLA-IO in Waat a four-hour drive away – resulted in at least 15 fatalities and 10 injured combatants, placing the area under close monitoring. Ayod and Paguir (Fangak County) remain calm, with DRC activities ongoing. Overall, the proximity of active conflict, combined with intercommunal tensions, continues to create a high-risk environment, particularly in areas between frontlines. Humanitarian access Humanitarian needs remain severe and multifaceted across Jonglei: Displacement and returns: Continued movements, including returns to Akobo, are placing additional pressure on already limited services. Food and nutrition: Nutrition service delivery is expanding in Akobo, yet needs remain high, with hundreds of SAM and MAM admissions reported by partners. Protection risks: Across all locations, communities face elevated risks of gender-based violence (GBV), family separation, abductions, psychosocial distress and intercommunal violence. Basic services: Limited access to WASH, health, and protection services persists, particularly in recently accessible or hard-to-reach areas.

South Sudan: DRC Situational Report #5 Jonglei Emergency (28 May 2026) Read More »